The realities of UX research: momentum vs learning

When it comes to starting a new digital project of any kind, a discovery phase almost always comes first. To make effective UX decisions later on, learning as much as possible about the problem and the context it sits within is crucial.

You need to know where you are trying to go before you can make a plan that gets you there. This is why the user research process matters from day one.

While there is no single formula for a discovery phase, it usually involves engaging users and stakeholders through interviews, surveys, usability tests, and a variety of research tasks. Based on this user research process, you start to understand who you are designing for, what users are trying to achieve, and where their pain points lie.

This learning phase should shape how you propose to solve those problems with a digital product. There is always more to uncover, but there is also a fine balance to maintain. One of the biggest challenges we see is managing the tension between gathering insights and maintaining project momentum.

Blog post

Four ways to win at user research

Our overview of the most popular UX research techniques out there. Find out which is right for you and when to use them.

Read more

Why momentum matters

Whether you are redesigning an existing experience or building a new one, moving at pace is critical. Markets shift rapidly, user needs evolve, and a quick product development cycle often gives teams a competitive edge.

Momentum fuels progress. Without it, projects risk losing stakeholder interest, internal support, and crucial funding.

Few things are more demoralising than reporting back to a board with news that little progress has been made. A loss of momentum can result in shrinking budgets and increasing scepticism. In many ways, maintaining a steady project rhythm is just as vital as the discovery work itself.

Momentum also influences how external and internal stakeholders perceive the value of the work. Keeping people energised and excited is key to navigating early-stage ambiguity.

In the world of UX optimisation, understanding how to balance research depth with delivery speed can be the difference between a project that thrives and one that stalls.

Why learning can slow things down

Securing participation for research is harder than it looks. Even when users are initially enthusiastic, fitting into people’s diaries can be a logistical challenge.

The reality is that most users do not care enough about your project to prioritise research participation. No matter how strong your incentives are, response rates are often low. Reaching out to 100 people and hearing back from 10 is not uncommon.

Stakeholder participation can be just as tricky. In startups, getting senior leaders involved can be relatively easy because they are closer to the product. In larger enterprises, however, it can feel almost impossible to secure time with decision-makers. Complex organisational layers and competing priorities slow everything down.

The bigger the organisation, the harder it is to move quickly. This is a reality every experienced user experience researcher learns to anticipate.

This difficulty impacts not just the pace of learning but the ability to make confident, well-informed design decisions. If too few perspectives are captured, it risks biasing the outcomes.

How to balance momentum and learning

In our experience, timeboxing and setting strict schedules are the best tools to prevent discovery from dragging on.

You might decide that month one is your ‘discovery month’. Whatever research is not completed by the end of that time simply will not be included, no exceptions. Alternatively, you could timebox two intensive weeks for user interviews, with a focus on speed over perfection.

Setting clear expectations around the user research process helps align everyone, from stakeholders to project teams. When the timebox ends, the team must decide: have we learned enough to move forward, or do we need a deliberate extension?

There will always be more to learn. However, chasing one more elusive interview or pushing for another round of testing must be weighed against the cost of delayed progress.

In the context of UX optimisation, pushing forward with imperfect but meaningful insights is often smarter than striving for an unattainable perfect discovery phase.

Setting up your project for faster learning

Internal buy-in is critical to success. Learning and momentum are much easier to balance when clients and internal teams understand their roles in the research process.

We often see clients surprised by how much logistical preparation a strong discovery phase requires. Ideally, stakeholder interviews should be booked and user invitations sent even before the kickoff meeting. The earlier the prep, the smoother the project.

It also matters who reaches out to potential participants. When user research requests come from an external agency, they are easier to ignore. Response rates improve significantly when someone internal, a known and trusted contact, sends the invitation.

Assigning dedicated project management resources, setting up tracking tools for participant responses, and building time buffers into the research plan can all help create breathing space without sacrificing momentum.

Why buy-in must go beyond budget approval

No matter how strong your agency partner is, successful research relies on more than external expertise. Internal stakeholders must commit to giving team members enough time to participate fully in the user research process.

This means allocating time during work hours, not expecting research to happen on the side. A project starved of proper team involvement will struggle, no matter how good the UX agency or user experience researcher is.

For B2B product teams, this investment of time can feel harder to justify because ROI is not immediate. However, skipping these foundational conversations increases the risk of expensive rework later on.

In the end, balancing momentum and learning requires shared ownership and commitment across both external partners and internal teams.

Keeping the learning alive beyond discovery

While the initial discovery phase lays the foundation, learning should not stop there. Product teams should continue collecting user insights post-launch through continuous research and feedback loops.

As your product evolves, ongoing dialogue with users and customer-facing teams is critical for UX optimisation. Agile user research methods, like short usability tests and feedback surveys, can keep insights flowing without major slowdowns.

Remember: discovery is just the first chapter. The user research process is an ongoing investment, not a one-off effort.

Lighthouse podcast

What would happen if you hired the world's greatest designer?

Getting amazing design work done isn’t as simple as hiring a designer and leaving them to it. Here’s what you can do to make sure you get the best results.

Balancing momentum and learning is not easy. It requires discipline, transparency, and a willingness to make imperfect decisions at the right time.

By setting clear timeboxes, preparing internal teams early, and building a culture of continuous learning, product teams can move faster without sacrificing insight. In UX, as in product management, sometimes good enough insights delivered on time are better than perfect insights that arrive too late.

Ultimately no-one with a digital product should ever stop learning about the problem they’re hoping to solve, but they do need to push on and get something built before they can progress and iterate.

Need help balancing learning and momentum in your next project? Talk to us. We help teams build faster without losing sight of what users really need.